The Davis Budget Catastrophe

Editorial

Los Angeles, CA

January 23, 2003

Facing the worst deficit in California’s history, Gray Davis is trying to solve his budget woes by dumping his financial problems on local government. With such a monumental task ahead of him, Davis is grabbing for what appears to be the easiest answers. He is proposing an easy grab of discretionary revenue used for critical local government services. The consequences of this dire action will reach farther into the future than even the effects of the energy crisis. Local cities and counties will be unable to bear the burden and all of California’s residents will pay the price.

The Governor and the state legislature dwindled a $12 billion surplus into a $34 billion deficit by over spending in good times. Now the Governor’s plan is simple: Raise taxes, re-align the fastest growing state run programs to counties while providing minimal funding, and eliminate 40% of the discretionary funding Counties use to provide critical services.

How can Davis assure us that his re-aligned programs will remain fully funded while at the same time he strips away the very source of vital local revenue promised to us in 1998 by the Vehicle Licensing Fee (VLF) backfill? The VLF backfill is the primary source of revenue counties use to deliver programs such as sheriffs, jails, emergency rooms, public health, district attorneys and child protective services. It is also the money that is required by law to be used to provide the necessary matching funds for many state and federal social and human service programs. Eliminating the VLF backfill will erase $191 million from the current budget year, which is more than half completed, and leave a loss of $472 million annually- nearly 40% of flexible revenues. Los Angeles County stands to lose $663 million dollars over the next 18 months under the Davis plan.
After breaking the VLF promise, Davis expects California’s counties to take on an additional $8.2 billion in program responsibilities without an assurance that there will be an ongoing, stable and increasing funding source to meet the increasing caseload demands. The re-aligned programs are among the fastest growing in the state. For example, Los Angeles County currently pays for 22% of the In Home Supportive Services program (IHSS), whose costs are growing by 14% per year. Davis wants to transfer the entire cost of the IHSS program over to counties without any pledge of increased funding. The County will simply not have the money to pay for the continuing growth and will be forced to cut other vital programs to pay for yet another unfunded state mandate. The Davis budget has also neglected to provide any money for trauma care. This year Los Angeles County received 20 million in state funds. Next year: zero.

The Governor plans to continue to administer, mandate, and expand these programs, while leaving counties to find a way to implement and pay for them. Local government should not be forced to bear the brunt of this burden. We cannot consider any additional re-alignment of responsibility for state programs until there are guarantees from the state that adequate funding will be provided. We also cannot tolerate the elimination of the VLF backfill that was promised to us by the state legislature and remains so critical to local services. Without these assurances, local cities and counties will be forced to cut vital programs causing the quality of life in our communities to suffer greatly for years to come.

Supervisor Don Knabe
County of Los Angeles, Fourth District

 

###